They grade students every single year. Someone should grade them.

Regulatory Standing: 30 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 40 of 100. Refund Policy: 10 of 100. Service Delivery: 25 of 100. Grievance Redressal: 30 of 100.

The only institute on this site with an adverse record across all six criteria. A ₹11 lakh regulatory penalty for misleading advertising — the first penalty ever issued for a second offence in this sector — sits alongside a centre that shut mid-course without notice and a published policy stating fees are simply not refundable.

Regulatory Standing: 40 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 40 of 100.

Penalised ₹5 lakh over advertisements claiming 216-plus selections in UPSC CSE 2022. The regulator found that 162 of those candidates — three in four — had cleared Prelims and Mains without the institute's paid help and had taken only its free Interview Guidance Programme. An earlier ₹3 lakh penalty was imposed in 2024.

Regulatory Standing: 30 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 60 of 100.

Penalised ₹15 lakh in February 2026 — the second regulatory penalty against the institute in two years — over advertisements claiming 645 selections out of 1,016 UPSC vacancies. The regulator found the institute concealed that many of the candidates it advertised had enrolled only for mock interview sessions.

Regulatory Standing: 65 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 40 of 100.

Penalised ₹5 lakh for concealing what its advertised successful candidates had actually bought. Of 682 candidates showcased, 674 had taken only a free mock interview programme — just 8 had paid for additional courses.

Regulatory Standing: 55 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 60 of 100.

Penalised ₹10 lakh in May 2026. The regulator found its success advertising did not disclose that many featured students belonged to free online batches, and that some had reportedly joined only after the examinations had already taken place.

Regulatory Standing: 65 of 100. Advertising Integrity: 35 of 100. Disclosure: 60 of 100.

Penalised ₹5 lakh in May 2026 for claiming large success numbers without consistent supporting records, and for counting students enrolled only in test series within its broader success advertising.